History-taking couplet station example

What the candidate reads


Candidate’s Instructions

Luc Léger, 59 years old, presents to your office complaining of jaundice.
In the next 5 minutes, obtain a focused and relevant history.
At the next station, you will be asked to answer questions about this patient.

What the examiner completes


Examiner’s Checklist
Fill in the bubble for each item completed satisfactorily

check

1.

Elicits onset/duration

 

check

2.

Elicits progression

 

 

3.

Elicits associated symptoms

 

check

 

- dark urine

 

check

 

- pain

 

check

 

- color of stool

 

check

 

- fever

 

 

4.

Elicits risk factors

 

check

 

- previous exposure to hepatitis

 

check

 

- recent blood transfusion

 

check

 

- intravenous drug use

 

check

 

- foreign travel

 

check

5.

Elicits an alcohol use history

 

 

6.

Conducts a review of systems

 

check

 

- skin

 

check

 

- gastrointestinal

 

check

 

- weight loss

 

check

 

- change in appetite

 

Did the candidate respond satisfactorily to the needs/problem(s) presented by this patient?

If unsatisfactory, please specify why:
(For items 4-6, please explain below)

Satisfactory

check Borderline

check Good

check Excellent

Unsatisfactory

check Borderline

check Poor

check Inferior

  1. Inadequate medical knowledge and/or provided misinformation
  2. Could not focus in on this patient's problem
  3. Demonstrated poor communication and/or interpersonal skills
  4. Actions taken may harm this patient
  5. Actions taken may be imminently dangerous to this patient
  6. Other

Do you have concerns regarding this candidate's ethical and/or professional behavior?
check  Yes  (please specify)                             check  No


What the candidate receives


Post-Encounter Probe

Q1. The abdominal examination of Luc Léger revealed no organ enlargement, no masses and no tenderness. What radiologic investigation would you first order to help discriminate the cause of the jaundice?
______________________________________________________

Q2. If the investigations revealed that this patient likely had a post-hepatic obstruction, what are the two principal diagnostic considerations?

  1. ____________________________________________________
     
  2. ____________________________________________________

Q3. What radiologic procedure would you consider to elucidate the level and nature of the obstruction?
______________________________________________________

Q4. If this patient were found to have a cancer localized to the ampulla of vater, what single treatment would you recommend?
_
____________________________________________________ 

What the post-encounter probe marker receives



Answer Key

Q1.

The abdominal examination of Luc Léger revealed no organ enlargement, no masses and no tenderness.  What radiologic investigation would you first order to help discriminate the cause of the jaundice?

 

 

 

Score

A1.

Abdominal (liver) ultrasound

4

 

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

2

 

Maximum

4

     

Q2.

If the investigations revealed that this patient likely had a post-hepatic obstruction, what are the two principal diagnostic considerations?

 

 

 

Score

A2.

Pancreatic (periampullary) cancer

2

 

Choledocholithiasis

2

 

Gallstones

1

 

Maximum

4

     

Q3.

What radiologic procedure would you consider to elucidate the level and nature of the obstruction?

 

 

 

Score

A3.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

4

 

Percutaneous trans-hepatic cholangiogram (PTC)

4

 

Computed tomography (CT) scan

1

 

Hida scan (biliary)

0

 

Liver scan (Technetium 99M labeled sulphur colloid)

0

 

Maximum

4

 

Q4.

If this patient were found to have a cancer localized to the ampulla of vater, what single treatment would you recommend?

 

 

 

Score

A4.

Whipple procedure (pancreatic-duodenectomy)

4

 

Biliary bypass

2

 

Excision

1

 

Chemotherapy

0

 

Radiotherapy

0

 

No treatment

0

 

Maximum

4


SearchContact UsSite MapFrançais
Medical Council of Canada